The Beliefs of a Separatist Feminist
Economically and psychologically, the interests of males are best protected by the coercion of females. It is pure optimism to see men in your mind’s eye as a group intensifying their interests with the intention of being altruistic to women. A separatist feminist chooses to go up against men more willingly than to reform them, out of a belief that men would not make over until they realize that they have to.
Separatist feminism is a type of feminism that doesn’t props up heterosexual interactions because of a faith in sexual differences between male and female. Moreover, a separatist feminist believes that these differences are un-resolvable.
Separatist feminists generally do not feel that men can make positive contributions to the feminist movement and that even well-intentioned men like to have an authority over women by being the head of the family.
As a substitute, separatist feminist gives attention to other women around, and dedicates all the energies and commitments to the women community only. And of course, all of this takes place remote from the patriarchal perspective. This characteristically takes in to account the following perspectives:
- Working with other ladies on the road to political or social aspirations.
- Preferring the lifestyles and family setups that are feminine only.
- Staying away from men as much as possible.
- Keeping away from working with men.
The feminist separatists are women of honor. They are inclined to acknowledge the social sanction that proceeds with discarding attachment to men and any other sort of male privilege– partial employment prospects, and social seclusion. They are, all the same, women who are dedicated to eliminating all kinds of repression by means of political work of different forms and through assessments of personal communications and interactions.
What’s considerable to bear in mind in discussions of separatism is the drastic, ground-breaking potential of lesbianism–that is to say, the potential for love and harmony between women to challenge male dominance–even though the potential is not executed by lots of lesbians.
The lesbian separatism is another form of separatist feminism. But a lesbian feminist may differ from a separatist feminist in numerous ways. We call a woman lesbian when she doesn’t go voluntarily for having sexual interactions with men; in that case, a lesbian separatist is a woman who has social interactions with men but only when necessary.
These conditions show a discrepancy based upon the individual circumstances. These women may have interactions with fathers and brothers that they are not ready to sever, despite the fact that these may develop less close in the end. Numerous of them must have employments to sustain themselves, in so doing, coming into contact with men as supervisors, colleagues, clients or customers. They may have male proprietors, if they are in schools; they possibly have male professors and are in classrooms with boys as well.
Separatist feminism is definitely not for every woman; neither is lesbian separatism. Despite the fact that early writings on the separatist feminism emphasized the opposite over and over again, I know a lot of heterosexual feminists who put a great effort in their attachments with men to generate feminist relationships.
To reflect otherwise is to make known that you believe the factual work, the best associations, the true heart of life is where the males are – and what type of feminist are you if that is what you feel?